Daniel Glancy vs Andreas Neykov Estadísticas cara a cara
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W L W L W W L
Form
W L W W L W W W L LCara A Cara: Glancy 1 - 0 Neykov
Ellas han jugado 2 conjuntos en total, con Glancy victoriosa 2 y Neykov victoriosa 0. El último partido entre Glancy y Neykov fue en el Greece F1, el 23-03-2015, Cuartos de First, Hard, con Daniel Glancy obteniendo la victoria 6-1 6-0
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Daniel Glancy | 1 |
| Andreas Neykov | 0 |
Greece F1(23-03-2015)
6
1
6
0
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Gibert VS Kudermetova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Korda VS Cina PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| GANADOR | PERDEDOR | MARCADOR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-0 | |||||
| Estadísticas | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Partidos cara a cara | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Ganados | 0 |
| 12 | Juegos Ganados | 1 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Faltas dobles totales | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Tiempo promedio de partido | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | % De Primer Servicio | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | % De Pts Ganados Con 1st Serv. | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | % De Pts Ganados Con 2nd Serv. | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Puntos de quiebre ganados % (total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | % de ganancia de puntos devueltos | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | La mejor de 3 sets gana % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | La mejor de 5 sets gana % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | % de victorias en desempates (total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | % De Sets Decisivos Ganados | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1er set ganado, partido ganado | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1er set ganado, partido perdido | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1er set perdido, partido ganado | 0% (1/0) |
Las estadísticas mostradas actualmente incluyen partidos de todos los niveles. Para excluir eventos de nivel inferior (según las estadísticas oficiales de ATP / WTA), usa el botón de alternar en el pie de página.
Partidos Recientes Jugados Por Daniel Glancy
Before:
| OPONENTE | MARCADOR | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Remi Boutillier
Player
Daniel Glancy
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve %
59%
(
58 of
98)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
44 of
98)
88
Total Points Won
80
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Glancy
Player
Ben Jones
55%
(
34 of
62)
1st Serve %
50%
(
24 of
48)
2
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
2
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
18 of
24)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
18 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
14 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF | 3-6 6-1 4-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Filip Peliwo
Player
Daniel Glancy
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
17 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Robert Carter
Player
Daniel Glancy
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
9
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
27%
(
15 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
Ver Más
Partidos Recientes Jugados Por Andreas Neykov
Before:
| OPONENTE | MARCADOR | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Danylo Kalenichenko
Player
Andreas Neykov
59%
(
24 of
41)
1st Serve %
50%
(
23 of
46)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
53
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-4 0-6 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-4 1-6 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
Ver Más
Desglose De Estadísticas Contra Todos Los Oponentes H2H
| Estadísticas | ||
|---|---|---|
| 43% (119/158) | Win/Loss | 45% (49/61) |
| 44% (270/349) | Sets Win/Loss | 46% (113/132) |
| 48% (2698/2925) | Games Win/Loss | 49% (1042/1080) |
| 47% (49/56) | Hard Win/Loss | 46% (11/13) |
| 39% (37/59) | Clay Win/Loss | 45% (38/47) |
| 43% (33/43) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.02 | Aces Per Game | 0 |
| 47 | Aces Total | 1 |
| 0.04 | Double Faults Per Game | 0 |
| 100 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 533.31 | Average Opponent Rank | 197.03 |
| 58% (1006/1743) | 1st Serve % | 50% (23/46) |
| 60% (600/1006) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (13/23) |
| 45% (334/737) | 2nd Serve Win % | 39% (9/23) |
| 34% (47/137) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 34% (548/1596) | Return Points Win % | 29% (12/41) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 17% (1/5) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 25% (1/3) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 33% (8/16) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 45% (109/134) | Futures W/L | 45% (49/61) |
| 43% (116/269) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 45% (49/109) |
| 25% (1/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 41% (31/75) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 42% (5/12) |
| 50% (33/66) | Deciding Set Win % | 42% (11/26) |
| 87% (118/103) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 79% (53/42) |
| 13% (118/15) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 21% (53/11) |
| 9% (158/15) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 12% (57/7) |
Otras predicciones
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
Si buscas predecir partidos de tenis o fútbol, ¡Matchstat.com lo tiene cubierto! Tenemos estadísticas de ligas, jugadores y equipos, y nos especializamos en estadísticas detalladas h2h entre jugadores de tenis o equipos de fútbol.
Todas nuestras predicciones se basan en el aprendizaje automático y la inteligencia artificial. Matchstat está diseñado para ayudarte en tus análisis y predicciones, pero la responsabilidad de tus predicciones finales es tuya.
Es bueno hablar... Ponte en contacto con nosotros [email protected]
